I'm after recommendations for a nice, detailed US (or, even better, North America) map/atlas thing. Having poked about, it seems like the more recent editions of popular US atlases seem to leave out "unimportant details" like smaller towns and such. Is this another Beginning of the EndTM ?
...and what about other places in the world ? what're the best maps to get for anywhere you're from, or overly fond of ?
11:42
reading
Comments have been closed for this post. If you've got something to say, please contact me by other means. Thanks!
Archives
...the last 3 months :
Recent Posts
Posts Recently Commented Upon
Ten Most Recent CDs
Currently Listening To
(thanks, last.fm.)
Other Recent Listening
Hair
sorta dark red with one blond bit.Wasting Time On
Links
Help Save The World
I may not (so far) run the kind of blog that posts social conscience linkage - other friends seem to have it covered better than I could manage (yes, I'm aware that's no excuse), but this doesn't mean that I don't care about the State of ThingsTM.
i donate to :
but there's other things worth worrying about too, like :
Looking For Something ?
Feed ?
yes indeed - a merged feed of my flickr photos, del.icio.us tags and posts here:
Licensing

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Comments (9)
My family has a Rand McNally Road Atlas from the 1970s that is nice and detailed. This looks like it: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0528844423 (Note dimensions—it's quite large.) There's a "deluxe" version that covers Canada and Mexico too.
But why, why do you want such a thing??
Posted by Michael S. | May 31, 2002 3:10 PM
Posted on May 31, 2002 15:10
Yeah, this one - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0528973762 - seems like it might be better, although it's a shame there aren't a few more comments about it. If you look at one or two of the others (the AAA one, and the Nat. Geographic one, for instance), in between the glowing praise you'll see the odd "we actually got /lost/ because this didn't have the side-roads we needed" stuff.
Not that I'm in that kind of a situation, but I like detail, and it's the out-of-the-way stuff that has odd/cool names, and so forth.
Why ? well, i love reading maps, and this book i'm currently reading, _blue highways_, mentions all sorts of random little places, and since my US geographical knowledge is fairly atrocious, even at a larger scale, i figure maybe it's time i did something about it.
Posted by cos | May 31, 2002 3:26 PM
Posted on May 31, 2002 15:26
Hee, you have no idea how amusing I find this: (1) you don't own a car; (2) you live quite a long way indeed from the US; (3) you are concerned that an atlas of 250 pages, each almost a foot square, is INSUFFICIENTLY DETAILED.
You like maps, huh? Have you seen this: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1582341001 I'll bring for you to borrow on Sunday.
Posted by Michael S. | May 31, 2002 4:31 PM
Posted on May 31, 2002 16:31
yeah, but like i said, it makes for better reading. if i just wanted main cities i'd go look at somebody's wall map.
(it's not just a good map of the US i want - i want good maps of everywhere !)
i haven't seen that, no. sounds interesting.
Posted by cos | May 31, 2002 4:47 PM
Posted on May 31, 2002 16:47
Oh c'mon, everyone scoured the Melways for fun as a kid, didn't they?
Posted by Graham | June 3, 2002 12:23 PM
Posted on June 3, 2002 12:23
absolutely. I even drew my own (100% invented) maps for a year or two, too (look, I was about 11. leave me alone). but I didn't know anything about hills and contours and stuff at the time, so I guess I should've called the place "flatland", or something.
Posted by cos | June 3, 2002 12:29 PM
Posted on June 3, 2002 12:29
re: leaving small towns off. It's one of George W. Bush's "homeland security" initiatives, alongside removing formerly public information from libraries. The ultimate goal is to have a situation like in the USSR, where entire cities of strategic significance (i.e., Magnetogorsk) officially didn't exist.
Posted by acb | June 4, 2002 1:30 PM
Posted on June 4, 2002 13:30
And I don't think that traversing maps for fun is limited to a childhood activity. Or maybe I'm just odd.
Posted by acb | June 4, 2002 1:38 PM
Posted on June 4, 2002 13:38
Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi vHi Hi Hi Hi Hi vvHi Hi Hi Hi Hi vvvHi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi vvHi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye Bye
Posted by Thomas Portor | October 15, 2002 6:05 AM
Posted on October 15, 2002 06:05